Sender Policy Framework

<grumpy>    motion:  we need a secretary to summarize and report to SPF-discuss
<Julian>    Well, I can do the summarizing/reporting part.
<Julian>    (...if the traffic on the council list doesn't get too high.)
<grumpy>    Julian: an important part is to dig through these logs and properly
            record what we voted on.
<Julian>    grumpy: I know. That's the easy part of reporting, I guess.
<csm>       the chair is prepared to entertain motions for secretary
* grumpy nominates Julian
* Julian accepts.
* csm seconds
<Julian>    (That was 2032a, I guess.)
<csm>       so labeled
<csm>       additional votes
<freeside>  2032a: yes
<grumpy>    2032a yes
<MarkK>     2032a: yes
<Julian>    2032a: yes
<csm>       so ordered
<Julian>    Can we have a definition for the secretary, too, please?
<csm>       oh sure
<csm>       the secretary drafts all minutes, vote results, and such other
            documentation as the council may direct
<Julian>    Ok.
<Julian>    ...and post it on the council mailing list?
<Julian>    (Or other places as the council may direct.)
<csm>       yes
<csm>       *UNLESS*
<csm>       it contains competitive info which must be redacted and redirected
            to the private list
<MarkK>     I thought we were going to post these logs in its entirity? I guess
            that is off, then
* grumpy suggest posting to SPF-discuss also
<Julian>    MarkK: No, it's not off. But a summary should go to spf-discuss.
<MarkK>     Ok
<csm>       can I clarify?
<Julian>    Go ahead.
<csm>       here is what I think
<csm>       what we have done so far should/will be posted in it's entirety to
            the spf-council list... interested parties can read it in the
            archives
<csm>       Julian: hopefully that is adequate instruction for handling that
            type of material
<Julian>    csm: Ok.